Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-29 03:06:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 35C681E320A15E43E3BA8B5E6F86CFA0C95F57D9B131B223619589AEF27A96AE
Participant Details
Original Note:
SCOTUS did not decide judges should rule over if carbon emissions are bad, they struck down Chevron which allowed agencies to interpret law relating to agency regulations when vague, the judge would rule on “reasonableness” of interpretation instead of the law itself https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/
All Note Details