Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-29 16:45:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E52FC044BD389D7A28457C1BE555F69203F60AEE8544A17886865C666756F630
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court did not "remove oversight" for anything. The Chevron Doctrine has been effectively dead for quite a while now. SCOTUS merely made it official. Courts are no longer required to defer to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous laws. The laws still apply. https://ballotpedia.org/Chevron_deference_(doctrine)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806768506077122815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E52FC044BD389D7A28457C1BE555F69203F60AEE8544A17886865C666756F630
  • createdAtMillis - 1719679528810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1806768506077122815E52FC044BD389D7A28457C1BE555F69203F60AEE8544A17886865C666756F630