Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-28 18:51:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A391222B720E1D0C11796746750769CCF216C6FC4A2BC4503C49EC11ED4B411B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note misrepresents how challenges to the law would operate. Under the new framework, judges with little or no expertise will be able to second-guess agency experts. Congress enacted the statutes, and this opinion does nothing to require them to act further. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806760943549878611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A391222B720E1D0C11796746750769CCF216C6FC4A2BC4503C49EC11ED4B411B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719600711377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1806760943549878611A391222B720E1D0C11796746750769CCF216C6FC4A2BC4503C49EC11ED4B411B