Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-28 23:30:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cureusは出版前審査は極めて短く、信頼できない出版物の雑誌のトップ2の雑誌です。 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cureus 当該論文は、公開CNでも指摘済のように https://twitter.com/ASKA_Pop_ASKA/status/1789090974016458893 https://twitter.com/i/birdwatch/t/1789090974016458893 がんの流行時の超過死亡が20年から6つの早期蔓延国で見られた確立した知見であり https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13027-024-00567-6/figures/3 https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5156 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37182218/ https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/30/9/1615/671269/Excess-Mortality-in-a-Nationwide-Cohort-of-Cancer https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39322-7 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.20.00471 論文図で接種との同時性が強調されている21年8月、22年8、12月↓ https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/figure/file/967567/lightbox_4c68a1f0eb0a11eeb1743f11e75c4a60-fig.1-Mortlity-Rates-All-cancers-yeary-and-monthly.png はいずれも新型コロナの入院数のピーク時でもあり https://medicalfacts.info/infect.rb?c=Japan&from=2020-02-01&to=2022-12-25&hosp_patients=true&new_vaccinations_smoothed_per_million=true&excess_mortality=true&two=true&l=ja&i=false 著者の福島氏ですら、接種が全ての原因とは思わないと認めていたのに https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/70618?page=2 接種との過大な関連づけを示唆する等↓ https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan?utm_medium=email&utm_source=transaction#!/ 、多数の問題が各所で指摘されていた事に注意が必要です。 https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-mrna-cancer-explosion-japan-no-national-emergency-declared-2024-05-07/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806702017391538210
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1719617422682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180670201739153821041A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE