Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-28 15:15:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9353EBA67F788E23B2C0E5AB226B90FC199B5BC379A72ADA3A4E9BE7AF0C2210
Participant Details

Original Note:

画像上部に不鮮明な形で表示されておりますが、出典は虚構新聞であり、記事の内容は事実ではないジョークです。 https://kyoko-np.net/2012021101.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806680120104747487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9353EBA67F788E23B2C0E5AB226B90FC199B5BC379A72ADA3A4E9BE7AF0C2210
  • createdAtMillis - 1719587752783
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18066801201047474879353EBA67F788E23B2C0E5AB226B90FC199B5BC379A72ADA3A4E9BE7AF0C2210