Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-27 18:33:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A418FD51502B00FE1A7464695C917283A4BBCAF81F8776A4470DA5E7832299F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The SCOTUS ruling did not find collusion between the White House and social media. It ruled that the lawsuit had no merit, as the government can legally request content be removed. If companies choose to remove the content, that is the choice of the company alone. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/06/26/politics/social-media-disinformation-supreme-court-ruling

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806390719999074499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A418FD51502B00FE1A7464695C917283A4BBCAF81F8776A4470DA5E7832299F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1719513191887
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1806390719999074499A418FD51502B00FE1A7464695C917283A4BBCAF81F8776A4470DA5E7832299F4