Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-27 21:31:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EB1AED62C5500C57EB69CA062EB18A9BD86A9FE57C3956BD0EE57F2A17FF10C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Opinion by ACB states that once removed standing is not enough and Plaintiffs cannot seek to enjoin Government for third party platform actions-especially when platforms had already begun to crack down on disinformation in accordance to their own policies. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806068318899749153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EB1AED62C5500C57EB69CA062EB18A9BD86A9FE57C3956BD0EE57F2A17FF10C
  • createdAtMillis - 1719523874017
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18060683188997491531EB1AED62C5500C57EB69CA062EB18A9BD86A9FE57C3956BD0EE57F2A17FF10C