Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-27 05:33:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87DCBE76FF5F3A6BE503C7C160BB75F4B4FF450AA58821021D7C6C3CDAA7BE9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - O post está claramente criticando o Twitter da ativista, se a ativista interpretou de forma incorreta o estudo, não tem relevância na crítica e não é necessária a nota. É fato que a ativista escreveu isso como pode ser visto no link. Nota não e necessária. https://web.archive.org/web/20230307215203/https://twitter.com/gretathunberg/status/1009757391515156480

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1805996048130715823
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 87DCBE76FF5F3A6BE503C7C160BB75F4B4FF450AA58821021D7C6C3CDAA7BE9A
createdAtMillis - 1719466403001
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 180599604813071582387DCBE76FF5F3A6BE503C7C160BB75F4B4FF450AA58821021D7C6C3CDAA7BE9A