Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-26 18:13:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78CC6FA88E12178C2FC2399F4388F090EC688427BAE86B800F6E4F12DF071FA9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court did not decide what the government can or can’t do. Rather, by a vote of 6 to 3, the court ruled that those challenging the government’s interaction with social media companies lacked legal standing to sue. https://www.npr.org/2024/06/26/nx-s1-5003970/supreme-court-social-media-case https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/06/26/politics/social-media-disinformation-supreme-court-ruling

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805991105328025987
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78CC6FA88E12178C2FC2399F4388F090EC688427BAE86B800F6E4F12DF071FA9
  • createdAtMillis - 1719425630446
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180599110532802598778CC6FA88E12178C2FC2399F4388F090EC688427BAE86B800F6E4F12DF071FA9