Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-26 19:56:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79E58B1189D55CACC90E973812F62DAEECC2200960CB63A2DFA27D3269C30D69
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court ruled that those bringing the lawsuit didn’t have standing. They didn’t get to the merits of whether the government can coerce social media companies to restrict misinformation. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805983156782178588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 79E58B1189D55CACC90E973812F62DAEECC2200960CB63A2DFA27D3269C30D69
  • createdAtMillis - 1719431791905
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180598315678217858879E58B1189D55CACC90E973812F62DAEECC2200960CB63A2DFA27D3269C30D69