Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-27 11:12:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5575673EDA1F95E7CA436164F351C2EFED3209061EBE65B920650D59FE647B6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source partagée dans ce post n'existe pas, et ces résultats ne sont pas le reflet d'une quelconque réalité. En citant le nom d'un organisme de presse et de sondage réputée, la personne cherche à manipuler les lecteurs en leur faisant croire que c'est avérer. https://x.com/httmine/status/1805723369758712200?t=WWuvLVTzV06IiTFZpevxHg&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1805855933269946529
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5575673EDA1F95E7CA436164F351C2EFED3209061EBE65B920650D59FE647B6B
createdAtMillis - 1719486736203
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18058559332699465295575673EDA1F95E7CA436164F351C2EFED3209061EBE65B920650D59FE647B6B