Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-26 10:39:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B36004C6866E8E0047F7140DFDB57C46521381D6341A9196330A6E003157458
Participant Details

Original Note:

Bowman was 17 points behind Latimer, about the same as the ultimate margin of victory with 90% of the vote counted, before AIPAC spent any money on this race: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20240404_NY16_Mellman.pdf https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/nyregion/bowman-latimer-primary.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805836000792658067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B36004C6866E8E0047F7140DFDB57C46521381D6341A9196330A6E003157458
  • createdAtMillis - 1719398354661
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18058360007926580671B36004C6866E8E0047F7140DFDB57C46521381D6341A9196330A6E003157458