Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-28 15:25:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C36C512C33D84D0ED58AE7B6699E9D4F49577AADE343C877433D85388BF9D7E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed notes miss the point of Kelly's article entirely and focus only on the image or what they mistakenly believe is "standard protocol" for evidence handling. Such arguments and opinions belong in the comments, not Notes. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805746790320554496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C36C512C33D84D0ED58AE7B6699E9D4F49577AADE343C877433D85388BF9D7E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1719588339194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1805746790320554496C36C512C33D84D0ED58AE7B6699E9D4F49577AADE343C877433D85388BF9D7E0