Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-25 22:02:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF8C308FC4F4F8AE24BF72CFAA638726983566BF89CDD9C00F974D67EC09D2E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The highlighted passage in no way confirms that the evidence was “doctored”. It states clearly that covers were applied appropriately and the papers arrayed for photographing, as is standard for presenting evidence. https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1805586898837975457?s=46&t=JdH7Whg52JprOtD97_U79g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805686927028318521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF8C308FC4F4F8AE24BF72CFAA638726983566BF89CDD9C00F974D67EC09D2E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1719352953724
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1805686927028318521CF8C308FC4F4F8AE24BF72CFAA638726983566BF89CDD9C00F974D67EC09D2E5