Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-25 20:52:13 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C36C512C33D84D0ED58AE7B6699E9D4F49577AADE343C877433D85388BF9D7E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The highlighted passage in no way confirms that the evidence was “doctored”. It states clearly that covers were applied appropriately and the papers arrayed for photographing, as is standard for presenting evidence. https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1805586898837975457?s=46&t=JdH7Whg52JprOtD97_U79g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805686927028318521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C36C512C33D84D0ED58AE7B6699E9D4F49577AADE343C877433D85388BF9D7E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1719348733859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1805686927028318521C36C512C33D84D0ED58AE7B6699E9D4F49577AADE343C877433D85388BF9D7E0