Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-25 21:08:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39F62F1073CCEF1D2810B09405AA2B7CEC58B2F0D4E5B84EF34E4EDC2BE50D26
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The highlighted passage in no way confirms that the evidence was “doctored”. It states clearly that covers were applied appropriately and the papers arrayed for photographing, as is standard for presenting evidence. https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1805586898837975457?s=46&t=JdH7Whg52JprOtD97_U79g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805686927028318521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39F62F1073CCEF1D2810B09405AA2B7CEC58B2F0D4E5B84EF34E4EDC2BE50D26
  • createdAtMillis - 1719349696178
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180568692702831852139F62F1073CCEF1D2810B09405AA2B7CEC58B2F0D4E5B84EF34E4EDC2BE50D26