Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-26 20:36:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32E06FF31A04ECA310232363DED011F4625326F4CAF017A764CDA3DC0E98FB55
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The highlighted passage in no way confirms that the evidence was “doctored”. It states clearly that covers were applied appropriately and the papers arrayed for photographing, as is standard for presenting evidence. https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1805586898837975457?s=46&t=JdH7Whg52JprOtD97_U79g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805686927028318521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32E06FF31A04ECA310232363DED011F4625326F4CAF017A764CDA3DC0E98FB55
  • createdAtMillis - 1719434166494
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180568692702831852132E06FF31A04ECA310232363DED011F4625326F4CAF017A764CDA3DC0E98FB55