Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-25 20:35:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 126716F10FD08310A758A1643A933663B1977B85AAB6D34992A4AC40B0EA256E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The highlighted passage in no way confirms that the evidence was “doctored”. It states clearly that covers were applied appropriately and the papers arrayed for photographing, as is standard for presenting evidence. https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1805586898837975457?s=46&t=JdH7Whg52JprOtD97_U79g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805686927028318521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 126716F10FD08310A758A1643A933663B1977B85AAB6D34992A4AC40B0EA256E
  • createdAtMillis - 1719347751410
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1805686927028318521126716F10FD08310A758A1643A933663B1977B85AAB6D34992A4AC40B0EA256E