Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-26 10:09:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25F462D81F4031B79BBF6D88EB6255A9393D3F712B0F5420704B4D96B071D62B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cluster 17 pouvait être considéré comme peu fiable en 2022, mais il n'y a aucune controverse plus récente à son sujet, bien que l'organisme ait effectué des sondages pour plusieurs élections.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805681436843774428
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25F462D81F4031B79BBF6D88EB6255A9393D3F712B0F5420704B4D96B071D62B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719396591058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180568143684377442825F462D81F4031B79BBF6D88EB6255A9393D3F712B0F5420704B4D96B071D62B