Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-25 21:47:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49B29532124F4AC4F336E384F27172C47A6867CE7B7689E5E112683ABA3D351B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Der Gegenstand der Aussage waren personenbezogene Daten. Eventuelle weiterführende Anmerkungen können gerne in den Kommentaren gemacht werden, die getroffene Aussage ist korrekt und bedarf keiner weiteren Notiz. https://background.tagesspiegel.de/verkehr-und-smart-mobility/briefing/anwalt-kritisiert-vermeintliche-anonymitaet-bei-verbrenner-umfrage

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805678070361473213
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49B29532124F4AC4F336E384F27172C47A6867CE7B7689E5E112683ABA3D351B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719352022074
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180567807036147321349B29532124F4AC4F336E384F27172C47A6867CE7B7689E5E112683ABA3D351B