Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-24 18:56:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B26F658765717CAA92159B3340932F2108C8F3DA699358D486F17DC82CCBD7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Any form of depiction of fictional characters is protected under free speech and not prosecutable under U.S. law. 2. While the post could be classified as comedy, funny or not is not point. Comedy is a medium of speech to convey information, thus in this case is false. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comedy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition https://web.archive.org/web/20231224053215/https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/535/234/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1805217106860109905
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 7B26F658765717CAA92159B3340932F2108C8F3DA699358D486F17DC82CCBD7E
createdAtMillis - 1719255416168
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18052171068601099057B26F658765717CAA92159B3340932F2108C8F3DA699358D486F17DC82CCBD7E