Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-24 10:53:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E3957C974EB4FEC4E7CB7C3B16A31AD6EC8ECDA54BDBA747D1A3FB742F8F78B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cette mesure est anticonstitutionnelle car elle représente une rupture du principe d'égalité. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/pdf/Conseil/princeg2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiB-4LdhfSGAxWwSaQEHTR6Cn0QFnoECCkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0cw-kCfq_ss7AtR7zPtd3e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1805188563153092989
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0E3957C974EB4FEC4E7CB7C3B16A31AD6EC8ECDA54BDBA747D1A3FB742F8F78B
createdAtMillis - 1719226419382
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18051885631530929890E3957C974EB4FEC4E7CB7C3B16A31AD6EC8ECDA54BDBA747D1A3FB742F8F78B