Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-23 22:29:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD7979DE7F187DC14A4FDF8F5572424D060AA56E50AB3061E9966304B1976124
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ao contrário do que a postagem alega, o pênalti não foi marcado com auxílio do VAR. Além deste pênalti marcado, há o questionamento sobre um outro pênalti para o Flamengo no 1o tempo ignorado pelo árbitro e pelo VAR. https://ge.globo.com/rj/futebol/brasileirao-serie-a/jogo/23-06-2024/fluminense-flamengo.ghtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804998248920203366
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD7979DE7F187DC14A4FDF8F5572424D060AA56E50AB3061E9966304B1976124
  • createdAtMillis - 1719181775916
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804998248920203366FD7979DE7F187DC14A4FDF8F5572424D060AA56E50AB3061E9966304B1976124