Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-24 19:01:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F233FBE70C789F8E330D56C84864752488CE2BE54330D6635859F0557F42D657
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Whilst yes, it's true it was a 'safety' consideration, it could be reasonably argued that it has never actually been a serious issue. The OP isn't disputing the reasons for the ban, or misrepresenting the article, merely stating a personal opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804992920845795412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F233FBE70C789F8E330D56C84864752488CE2BE54330D6635859F0557F42D657
  • createdAtMillis - 1719255690204
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804992920845795412F233FBE70C789F8E330D56C84864752488CE2BE54330D6635859F0557F42D657