Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-24 19:27:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59
Participant Details

Original Note:

The story that was quoted did not point to any factual evidence as to the alternative reasoning of targeting. A media piece that includes the words "likely" or "maybe" are mere speculation and garbage (in the fore-mentioned note) .

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804969367479935278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59
  • createdAtMillis - 1719257247816
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804969367479935278EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59