Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-24 04:17:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C30A5283592F54354993B346AF5A998E470F0FC6D9EFBCBDFA1B9497C005045
Participant Details

Original Note:

While I do believe this is misleading, it is a valid opinion, not disproven by substantive evidence. The suggested note presents an Electoral Calculus projection as "polling", which is misleading. Responses to this would be better placed in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804900008501669953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C30A5283592F54354993B346AF5A998E470F0FC6D9EFBCBDFA1B9497C005045
  • createdAtMillis - 1719202621202
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18049000085016699533C30A5283592F54354993B346AF5A998E470F0FC6D9EFBCBDFA1B9497C005045