Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-23 17:40:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 397C51182FE8196694D5FCDD4CA8292F7B2D42F184EA2526661AA66F455DD4F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

While I do believe this is misleading, it is a valid opinion, not disproven by substantive evidence. The suggested note presents an Electoral Calculus projection as "polling", which is misleading. Responses to this would be better placed in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804900008501669953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 397C51182FE8196694D5FCDD4CA8292F7B2D42F184EA2526661AA66F455DD4F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1719164400678
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804900008501669953397C51182FE8196694D5FCDD4CA8292F7B2D42F184EA2526661AA66F455DD4F6