Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-24 20:40:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0346AB8DD2DA7B84D9EDCE6D325F1BAB5AEADD229E830C438B252D46FBEAC0CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

While I do believe this is misleading, it is a valid opinion, not disproven by substantive evidence. The suggested note presents an Electoral Calculus projection as "polling", which is misleading. Responses to this would be better placed in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804900008501669953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0346AB8DD2DA7B84D9EDCE6D325F1BAB5AEADD229E830C438B252D46FBEAC0CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1719261657887
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18049000085016699530346AB8DD2DA7B84D9EDCE6D325F1BAB5AEADD229E830C438B252D46FBEAC0CB