Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-23 08:30:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD528BDAF02EB3C175E0BD9A8FC6EC9ED7C9D9D60A31643642494B7C9DA7AFD4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Si le concerné dément, un quotidien français représente une source plus fiable et ayant intérêt à davantage d'objectivité que le compte d'infos X Mediavenir.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804631395546870086
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD528BDAF02EB3C175E0BD9A8FC6EC9ED7C9D9D60A31643642494B7C9DA7AFD4
  • createdAtMillis - 1719131447202
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804631395546870086DD528BDAF02EB3C175E0BD9A8FC6EC9ED7C9D9D60A31643642494B7C9DA7AFD4