Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-22 22:20:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F201B12151D54D57B18758EAED76564903588C0455E5101D6FF1600361C71A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Si le concerné dément, un quotidien français représente une source plus fiable et ayant intérêt à davantage d'objectivité que le compte d'infos X Mediavenir.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804631395546870086
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F201B12151D54D57B18758EAED76564903588C0455E5101D6FF1600361C71A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1719094819953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18046313955468700862F201B12151D54D57B18758EAED76564903588C0455E5101D6FF1600361C71A0