Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-23 02:11:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F636999B5B4AC8114E47D224506C978226BF27681EFE2CE7AC9E8F947C266188
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed Note is wildly irrelevant and arguably an abuse of this process. The writers clearly state that the doctor is not an expert in any aspect of viruses or infectious diseases. Her qualifications in sociology are beside the point and in fact bolster the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804572930266812591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F636999B5B4AC8114E47D224506C978226BF27681EFE2CE7AC9E8F947C266188
  • createdAtMillis - 1719108675572
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804572930266812591F636999B5B4AC8114E47D224506C978226BF27681EFE2CE7AC9E8F947C266188