Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-22 05:28:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8EB2CE92AD6E11771CA310B8D8C78588AC0B3C5A59130760EF7CF9322311C67
Participant Details

Original Note:

The only study making this claim was retracted https://link.springer.com/article/10.1631/jzus.2003.0236

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804226785523175779
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8EB2CE92AD6E11771CA310B8D8C78588AC0B3C5A59130760EF7CF9322311C67
  • createdAtMillis - 1719034137835
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804226785523175779D8EB2CE92AD6E11771CA310B8D8C78588AC0B3C5A59130760EF7CF9322311C67