Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 19:01:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C323314C3595F5E8F3DF7966B440416A9932DA6AC09665E5B3836D601E2E5C27
Participant Details

Original Note:

Thomas's dissent states unconvicted people should not be deprived of their rights in a civil court which has fewer civil rights protections than a criminal court. Reich's characterization that Thomas believes convicted abusers should still have access to firearms is untrue. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804203147122086135
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C323314C3595F5E8F3DF7966B440416A9932DA6AC09665E5B3836D601E2E5C27
  • createdAtMillis - 1718996518187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804203147122086135C323314C3595F5E8F3DF7966B440416A9932DA6AC09665E5B3836D601E2E5C27