Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-21 18:00:13 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BC99D99E1552463A7DA68ADF6B136502921A9DB4B6FEA2132CFCF6AD48F9D67B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Thomas's dissent states unconvicted people should not be deprived of their rights in a civil court which has fewer civil rights protections than a criminal court. Reich's characterization that Thomas believes convicted abusers should still have access to firearms is untrue. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf
All Note Details