Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 20:34:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A2F9C2C049A9A11BA04B5469B4B113141051AFF87E522524EE35E0D3B92812B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an inaccurate description of the actual ruling in the Erlinger case. The Supreme Court held that a unanimous jury, rather than a judge, must decide whether past offenses qualify the defendant for a 15yr sentence for repeat offenders under the Armed Career Criminals Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-370_i4dj.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804172104541065425
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A2F9C2C049A9A11BA04B5469B4B113141051AFF87E522524EE35E0D3B92812B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719002096989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18041721045410654256A2F9C2C049A9A11BA04B5469B4B113141051AFF87E522524EE35E0D3B92812B