Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 16:48:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26DF64FC53A46900122DBF39F2976FFCEA6F3E23844073BEECE8F8F7E1B8B754
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Note purposes good a reliable sources but it seems CN writer didn't bother to read the article completely and speculating his/her opinion on the topic This is not comment section, if you post a CN at least read the source you are attaching

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804105239101878672
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26DF64FC53A46900122DBF39F2976FFCEA6F3E23844073BEECE8F8F7E1B8B754
  • createdAtMillis - 1718988500043
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180410523910187867226DF64FC53A46900122DBF39F2976FFCEA6F3E23844073BEECE8F8F7E1B8B754