Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 13:28:28 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 147CDB71736315D5140554412D1DBFDA5E5B85BEF3D4608FEF9882B8A4B795A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

1"some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place"(本ポストの指す部分) 2" if the content that comes out of it is not very high quality"(ノートの指摘部分) "質の低いものを生み出すならクリエイティブな仕事はそもそも存在すべきでなかったかも"という意味で、これはノートの指摘部分を勘案した場合でも意味合いは特に変わらない事に注意して下さい。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804067054775079233
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 147CDB71736315D5140554412D1DBFDA5E5B85BEF3D4608FEF9882B8A4B795A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1718976508211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804067054775079233147CDB71736315D5140554412D1DBFDA5E5B85BEF3D4608FEF9882B8A4B795A4