Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 16:51:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34C27474DACF68B064589786418B3824600A95D56A6A8F8A6FDF58CD3C2B8265
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dieser Versuch ist ohne zusätzlichen Kontext irreführend. In einen geschlossenen Versuch mit stabilen anderen Faktoren ist mehr CO2 = gut! Aber realistisch betrachtet verändert mehr CO2 alle anderen Faktoren deutlich negativ! https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/dont-plants-do-better-environments-very-high-co2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804055678715044116
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34C27474DACF68B064589786418B3824600A95D56A6A8F8A6FDF58CD3C2B8265
  • createdAtMillis - 1718988692216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180405567871504411634C27474DACF68B064589786418B3824600A95D56A6A8F8A6FDF58CD3C2B8265