Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 09:01:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 833A80B69C1569C16BFA05679107141616A57E1FE717CE443BDF366F5DE910A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Der Autor der mit vielen Referenzen versehenen Community Note hat die letzte Referenz (von cochrane.org selbst!) wohl nicht gelesen. Da steht, dass im Review keine signifikanten Ergebnisse für oder wider Masken festgestellt worden sind. Der Post ist also faktisch richtig.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804012300216488137
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 833A80B69C1569C16BFA05679107141616A57E1FE717CE443BDF366F5DE910A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1722416494859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804012300216488137833A80B69C1569C16BFA05679107141616A57E1FE717CE443BDF366F5DE910A8