Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 09:12:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7FD11B28739BB7E379BAF9DBB3C4C09E720DC3B181D1BA5C416CA09CB315064
Participant Details

Original Note:

@SloaneFragment's tweet is a FRAUD. Forensic photo analysis reveals: These are NOT "before & after" photos. They are bit-for-bit matching copies of the same file: Hashes match. And the single image isn't even a real photograph of Stonehenge, her image was computer generated. https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=240e6d621f6f9752d42b4036ae7c5a071484e40c.219629

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1803962618425794784
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D7FD11B28739BB7E379BAF9DBB3C4C09E720DC3B181D1BA5C416CA09CB315064
createdAtMillis - 1718961152008
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1803962618425794784D7FD11B28739BB7E379BAF9DBB3C4C09E720DC3B181D1BA5C416CA09CB315064