Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 03:33:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 598C04DB46F2C34EC9CF982886432949466A63395C92B7C6EA828723664468E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

@SloaneFragment's tweet is a FRAUD. Forensic photo analysis reveals: These are NOT "before & after" photos. They are bit-for-bit matching copies of the same file: Hashes match. And the single image isn't even a real photograph of Stonehenge, her image was computer generated. https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=240e6d621f6f9752d42b4036ae7c5a071484e40c.219629

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803962618425794784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 598C04DB46F2C34EC9CF982886432949466A63395C92B7C6EA828723664468E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1718940834891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1803962618425794784598C04DB46F2C34EC9CF982886432949466A63395C92B7C6EA828723664468E7