Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-20 21:19:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7B2792287F3C2F0D585B3A91949F541132EAC543507B257E72FEF9DFF8D74BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le post est trompeur car il fournit une interprétation biaisée de l'enquête d'Harris Interactive : il omet de mentionner les candidats soutenus par LR et le RN, ce qui représente 2 points de pourcentage supplémentaires. https://harris-interactive.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/06/BVCXERDFYGBYH.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803856185310732790
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7B2792287F3C2F0D585B3A91949F541132EAC543507B257E72FEF9DFF8D74BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1718918382648
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1803856185310732790C7B2792287F3C2F0D585B3A91949F541132EAC543507B257E72FEF9DFF8D74BA