Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-20 20:16:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C236C614A9D618DDA3F6CD22803ECD13AE2E67DF858299DD061F0A09E2905E53
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le post est trompeur car il fournit une interprétation biaisée de l'enquête d'Harris Interactive : il omet de mentionner les candidats soutenus par LR et le RN, ce qui représente 2 points de pourcentage supplémentaires. https://harris-interactive.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/06/BVCXERDFYGBYH.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803856185310732790
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C236C614A9D618DDA3F6CD22803ECD13AE2E67DF858299DD061F0A09E2905E53
  • createdAtMillis - 1718914616552
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1803856185310732790C236C614A9D618DDA3F6CD22803ECD13AE2E67DF858299DD061F0A09E2905E53