Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-20 10:52:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E33733598DD1E17633F5CFE46A29D48C18C052F25876CF112B74547C6DEF54B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Even if it were true and supported by the evidence - which it isn't - the proposed note would only meet the dizzying heights of pearl-clutching speculation about an impossible counterfactual. "What if we lived in a world without shrimp?" is not a basis for a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803739158197997613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E33733598DD1E17633F5CFE46A29D48C18C052F25876CF112B74547C6DEF54B
  • createdAtMillis - 1718880733477
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18037391581979976139E33733598DD1E17633F5CFE46A29D48C18C052F25876CF112B74547C6DEF54B