Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-20 11:36:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E3D9974322B37C9081862A4473180006E1ABD31714139A1B892AEA928B0D2B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Even if it were true and supported by the evidence - which it isn't - the proposed note would only meet the dizzying heights of pearl-clutching speculation about an impossible counterfactual. "What if we lived in a world without shrimp?" is not a basis for a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803739158197997613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E3D9974322B37C9081862A4473180006E1ABD31714139A1B892AEA928B0D2B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1718883380247
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18037391581979976135E3D9974322B37C9081862A4473180006E1ABD31714139A1B892AEA928B0D2B2