Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 06:01:14 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B6E3FD989DAF3BC7ADAE9122FDEC8A5B7A1646869B54286A948C0CF4BDEDF0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Les arguments avancés par sncf sont fallacieux : s'ils servent à identifier le porteur de billet nomminatif, rien n'oblige à vendre de billet nommlinatif. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000032284342 La raison de lier les billets à un nom est commerciale, en empêchant la revente et permettant un tarif progressif.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1803724027866784045
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B6E3FD989DAF3BC7ADAE9122FDEC8A5B7A1646869B54286A948C0CF4BDEDF0BE
createdAtMillis - 1718949674146
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1803724027866784045B6E3FD989DAF3BC7ADAE9122FDEC8A5B7A1646869B54286A948C0CF4BDEDF0BE