Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-20 07:33:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DCABB7EC72DE5148CBAB220FF72DE23F4BCF63BEA6ED6A71344B06DCF0B4EDA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the claim is about the party, not its caucus. If someone has data on party membership showing its makeup, that would be relevant context. Evidence about the caucus does not address the claim about the party.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803567422693318980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DCABB7EC72DE5148CBAB220FF72DE23F4BCF63BEA6ED6A71344B06DCF0B4EDA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1718868791173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1803567422693318980DCABB7EC72DE5148CBAB220FF72DE23F4BCF63BEA6ED6A71344B06DCF0B4EDA4