Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-20 03:47:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5982992DA11A3AFF6F753386E64E60AD6A8CB2BE26DE866779B4C92C38A89BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the claim is about the party, not its caucus. If someone has data on party membership showing its makeup, that would be relevant context. Evidence about the caucus does not address the claim about the party.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803567422693318980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5982992DA11A3AFF6F753386E64E60AD6A8CB2BE26DE866779B4C92C38A89BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1718855259130
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1803567422693318980B5982992DA11A3AFF6F753386E64E60AD6A8CB2BE26DE866779B4C92C38A89BE