Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-20 02:53:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 92B655248015AAA12B8100A5FC255371D1A39888B0A7148058C793CC53248BE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

La papier original n'a été ni publié, ni annullé, ni censuré par le Lancet. Il a été supprimé des serveurs, avant même d'atteindre l'étape de revue par des pairs (preprint), car il présentait une méthodologie défectueuse qui aurait empeché toute publication. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NL9BK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803510112990171256
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 92B655248015AAA12B8100A5FC255371D1A39888B0A7148058C793CC53248BE1
  • createdAtMillis - 1718851996325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180351011299017125692B655248015AAA12B8100A5FC255371D1A39888B0A7148058C793CC53248BE1