Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-19 19:04:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 70F572C7A4DF5967490488D65B6ED5AC948FC3AF7899C33EC057C5B40B740269
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mélange de genres, l'auteur du post compare des statistiques familiales ((ex)- conjoint) à une potentielle représentation allochtone/autochtone. Potentielle propagande électorale et biais idéologique, les statistiques ethniques étant difficilement exploitables. https://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2019/03/19/la-difficile-utilisation-des-statistiques-ethniques-en-france_5438453_4355770.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1803460760082825299
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 70F572C7A4DF5967490488D65B6ED5AC948FC3AF7899C33EC057C5B40B740269
createdAtMillis - 1718823860437
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 180346076008282529970F572C7A4DF5967490488D65B6ED5AC948FC3AF7899C33EC057C5B40B740269